Geography shapes global politics and how nations interact with each other. Factors like landscape, climate, and resources are key. They influence the power balance between countries. These elements are a core part of why the world is as it is.
The Himalayas stand between China and India, shaping political ties. In Europe, shared river systems foster cooperation. However, Africa’s challenges, like few waterways, affect its connections with the world.
Even with these obstacles, countries like the U.S. have expanded and defended their lands. This shows geography is not a complete barrier. It’s more like a challenge that can be overcome.
Geography acts like a “low-security prison”. For example, the U.S. and Canada share a friendly border despite different cultures. But, geography’s impact on politics and power distribution is clear. It’s a key focus in studying global affairs and political geography.
Key Takeaways
- Geography plays a crucial role in shaping the political and economic relationships between nations.
- Geographical factors such as landscape, climate, and natural resources can create both barriers and opportunities for nations.
- The distribution of power and influence on the global stage is heavily influenced by a country’s physical geography and access to strategic resources and trade routes.
- Expansion and territorial disputes are often driven by a nation’s desire to secure its borders and gain a strategic advantage over its neighbors.
- The legacy of colonialism has resulted in geopolitical boundaries that often disregard cultural and ethnic divisions, leading to ongoing instability and conflict in many regions.
Geopolitics: The Inescapable Influence of Geography
Geographical Factors in International Relations
Geography impacts international politics deeply. It includes things like the land, weather, people, and the resources of a place. These factors shape the interactions between countries.
The Himalayas clearly divide China and India. On the other hand, interconnected rivers in Europe bring nations closer. Meanwhile, the lack of open water and thick forests in Africa isolate the region. This isolation has kept sub-Saharan Africa somewhat distant from the rest of the world. Leaders have often found geography to be like a solid boundary that defines a nation.
The Interplay of Landscape, Resources, and Geopolitics
Natural resources, climate, and the lay of the land also play a big part in how countries act. For instance, having access to oil can give a nation both economic and military strength. However, natural barriers like mountains or deserts can make movement difficult. This can change how leaders think about strategy.
Seeing how physical features and geopolitics work together helps us understand past events. It also lets us guess where trouble might arise in the future. In essence, geography acts like a secret player in global politics.
Prisoners of Geography: Nations Bound by Their Terrain
Nations are like prisoners of their land. The place they are born shapes who they are. For example, the Himalayas have kept China and India far apart. Meanwhile, rivers in central and western Europe bring countries together.
In contrast, the lack of water passages and thick jungles separate sub-Saharan Africans from each other and the world.
Physical Barriers and Natural Defenses
The United States, though, has thrived through large territories, from the Appalachians to the Rocky Mountains. This was achieved despite tough imperial competitors. This success shows geography can be a “low-security prison.” Yet, regions like the east-central part of Europe have settled in ways that go against the land’s logic.
The United States and Canada haven’t become one country. Even though they share a very long, not-so-sensible border.
Access to Trade Routes and Coastal Regions
Controlling trade routes and coastal areas is key in geopolitics and economy. Take countries that control major points like the Strait of Malacca. They have a lot of power over the nations that depend on these routes.
Also, being able to reach ports all year greatly influences a nation’s actions. This has driven Russia to annex Crimea. It also drives its efforts to be a bigger player in the Black Sea area.

Resource Competition: The Geopolitical Quest for Energy and Wealth
On the world stage, countries are caught up in a fierce battle for key resources. This is especially true for fossil fuels. Places without enough energy at home often look elsewhere. They use various methods, from making trade deals to taking over places by force.
Take Japan, for example. In the past, it invaded parts of Asia to get the energy it needed. Japan didn’t have a lot of energy sources of its own. On the other hand, China has become very strong economically. Chinese companies have worked hard to get the energy needed for their fast growth. They often do this in African countries rich in resources.
Securing Energy Sources Through Trade and Conflict
China’s way of getting resources from Africa might seem less violent than past European actions. But, the result is much the same. Africa’s wealth and resources are now helping feed the world’s biggest economies. The reasons behind this competition are many. They involve trade, conflict, and the lasting effects of neocolonialism.
Exploiting Africa’s Resources: A Neocolonial Narrative
The fight for energy and resources has made Africa a major battleground. Global powers, both old and new, want a share of Africa’s treasures. This situation carries on the legacy of neocolonialism. For centuries, international relations have swayed the flow of Africa’s riches away from its people. Unfortunately, this trend continues, preventing sustainable growth and fair prosperity within Africa.
Strategic Locations: Gateways to Power and Influence
The place of a country on the map often decides its power in the world. Countries that control important trade paths have more power over who uses them. The Strait of Malacca is a narrow sea lane. It’s between Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore and is very important. It’s a place where China and other countries send a lot of oil. Because of its economic force, the U.S. and China are both working to be closer with nations in Southeast Asia who control it.
Controlling Vital Trade Chokepoints
Nations also want to own ports that are good to use all year. Not having these can really hurt a country’s ability to trade and show off its naval force. In 2014, Russia took over Crimea to have a port on the Black Sea. This move gave Russia more power over nearby trade paths.
The Importance of Year-Round Ports
There’s always a fight over key places. This can be around important sea lanes or ports that don’t ice over. The countries that control these places often have more say in global events.
| Geopolitical Factor | Importance | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Chokepoints | Provide economic leverage over nations that rely on those routes | Strait of Malacca, controlled by Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore |
| Year-Round Ports | Enable uninterrupted maritime trade and naval operations | Russia’s annexation of Crimea to gain access to the Black Sea |
Geopolitics: How Geography Shapes Global Politics
Geopolitical Factors Driving International Conflicts
Nations aim to control trading routes and energy sources. They get ready for big conflicts by strengthening their defenses. To do this, they try to take over key areas that would help them in wars. If they can’t do this directly, big countries might fight to gain power in those regions. They use different tactics like diplomacy, trading, and helping with military forces.
The Role of Geography in Proxy Wars
For instance, China wanted Tibet to secure its border with India. This would give them military advantages in any border issues. When a big nation can’t own an important area, they find other ways to increase their influence. They aim to avoid fighting directly and causing serious damage to both sides.
| Geopolitical Factor | Impact on Global Politics |
|---|---|
| Control of Trade Routes | Provides economic and political leverage over nations dependent on those routes |
| Access to Energy Resources | Enables nations to fuel their economies and project military power globally |
| Strategic Geographic Positioning | Allows nations to defend borders, project influence, and gain advantages in conflicts |
| Ethnic/Cultural Divides | Can lead to proxy wars and instability in regions where borders disregard cultural geography |
Geographic Vulnerability: The Curse of Weak Natural Defenses
Where a nation is on the map can greatly influence its chances of being invaded. Places without strong natural barriers face more threats. The Korean Peninsula is a clear example. It’s been a battleground for its powerful neighbors – Japan, China, and Russia over the years. Due to few natural borders, these countries have often tried to control or invade Korea.
The Korean Peninsula sits in a key spot near big nations. Without high mountains or vast deserts to block enemies, it’s been hard for Korea to keep its freedom. Powerful nations have often seen Korea as a valuable piece of land to control. Its exposed location means it’s been repeatedly invaded and fought over, leading to many periods of unrest.
Over and over, Korea has been at the mercy of its surrounding rivals. In its strategic location, it’s been a target for those looking to expand their power. Its flat lands and open shores have not stopped invaders, leading to times of being taken over and fought against.
The Korean Peninsula’s position and lack of natural defenses. Have played a huge role in its troubled past. It’s seen many invasions and struggles for control. This ongoing challenge has shown the strength of the Korean people. And it keeps having a big impact on Northeast Asia today.
The Arctic: A New Frontier for Geopolitical Rivalry
The Arctic was once a distant and quiet place. But now, it’s at the heart of a growing global power struggle. With rising temperatures, the ice in the Arctic is melting. This is making it easier for countries to explore for resources and use new shipping routes. The United States, Russia, and China are all eyeing the Arctic for its potential wealth of oil, gas, and minerals. This competition has sparked territorial disputes and a race to control the region.
Territorial Disputes and Resource Exploration
With the Arctic ice melting, nations are eager to claim its resources. Almost a quarter of the world’s oil, gas, and minerals are thought to be in the Arctic. This makes up 22% of the globe’s undiscovered resources. Countries are racing to explore and utilize these riches. But this has also brought about tension and the threat of conflict.
The United States’ Diminishing Arctic Presence
The U.S. used to be a big player in the Arctic. But it has recently taken a step back. It has lost its leading position in terms of icebreaker ships. Now, it only has one, from a fleet that was once strong with six such ships. The country also hasn’t agreed to the U.N. Law of the Sea Treaty. By doing so, the U.S. has given up claims to a large area of the Arctic sea territory. This means it’s missing out on potential resources and can’t protect its interests in this region like before.

| Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Arctic population | Around 4 million people |
| Estimated Arctic oil, gas, and mineral deposits | Nearly a quarter of the world’s total |
| Arctic resources as a percentage of world’s undiscovered, recoverable resources | 22% |
| Arctic temperature increase in the last 30 years | 1.9 degrees Celsius |
| Reduction in Arctic sea ice coverage and thickness over the past three decades | Significant |
| Arctic Council founding member states | 5 |
Russia’s Geopolitical Ambitions: Seeking Access to Open Seas
Russia’s thinking about world politics is shaped by its special place in the world. It resides on a huge, flat area yet lacks easy, year-round sea access. Over the years, its leaders have aimed to keep threats far by controlling lands like Ukraine, Siberia, and the Far East. They have also aimed to try to get close to Constantinople and India, as Peter the Great suggested. This was to get to the much-desired open seas.
This ambition carries on, whether the country is led by czars, communists, or people concentrating on their businesses. As Marshall points out, whether czarist, Communist, or following capitalism closely, Russia still faces issues. It has been looking for warm-water ports that stay ice-free all year. This has highly influenced Russia’s actions around the world for years.
The Importance of Buffer Zones and Warm-Water Ports
Due to its location, Russia lacks natural barriers to protect itself from attacks. It needs to create layers of defense in the lands around it. Taking Crimea back in 2014 gave Russia the vital port of Sevastopol, helping with this need.
Russia has also been updating its naval power and using missiles from the Caspian Sea in Syria. It’s exploring the idea of the Eurasia Canal. This canal would link the Caspian and Azov seas, showing Russia’s plan to give landlocked places sea access.
The Legacy of Colonialism: Geopolitical Boundaries Defying Cultural Geography
The legacy of colonialism greatly shaped the world we know, creating nation-states that often ignored the native cultures. For example, Pashtuns found themselves split between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Similarly, Iraq joined Kurds, Sunni Arabs, and Shia Arabs under one nation. In Africa, the Congo ended up as a huge, yet divided, country with over 200 ethnic groups.
These decisions led to land disputes and civil wars, costing many lives. By mixing different groups together, colonialism set the stage for ongoing conflicts. It made it hard for nations to form a unified identity and function effectively.
The impact of colonialism is still visible, and not in a good way. Today’s geopolitical problems reflect those past decisions, challenging today’s leaders and societies.
| Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Donation contributions for free memberships for Global South scholars | $250,000 |
| Percentage of donations allocated to conference bursaries | 15% |
| Frequency of student experience events organized | Quarterly |
| Ratio of donations towards anti-bribery and corruption policy, anti-slavery and human trafficking policy | 3:2 |
| Occurrence rates of conflicts of interest policy implementations | Annually |
| Proportion of funds received allocated to Working Group end of year reports | 25% |
| Comparative analysis of donations for Face-to-Face Activity Fund versus Founders Fund | 60% : 40% |
| Distribution of grants awarded under the Postgraduate Network (PGN) | 50 grants |
| Number of articles published in Critical Military Studies, Astropolitics, Colonial, Postcolonial and Decolonial (CPD) Working Groups | 75 articles |
| Ratio of nominees for Best Article in the Review of International Studies Prize and Susan Strange Best Book Prize | 3:2 |
| Frequency of nominations for Distinguished Excellence In Teaching International Studies Prize | Biannual |

Geopolitical Strategies: Expansion for Defensive Purposes
Nations expand to make their borders more secure. Some places are easier to defend. China annexed Tibet to make its border with India safer. While India can’t easily attack through Tibet’s mountains, China gains a big advantage.
Big nations can’t always take control of important areas directly. They might use diplomacy, trade, or military aid instead. This helps them gain geopolitical influence without fighting another big power.
These strategies focus on defensive purposes and keeping borders safe. By playing to their geographic strengths, countries can boost their military power. This helps them stay stable and influential worldwide over time.
Geopolitical Strategies: Expansion for Defensive Purposes
Nations often expand their territories to make their borders more secure. They pick areas that are easier to defend. For instance, China took over Tibet to protect its border with India. Despite difficulty, having control over Tibet gives China a key advantage if there’s ever a conflict.
When a big power can’t directly rule a strategic spot, they might use other ways like making deals or giving military help. This is a way to keep the peace without fighting a powerful rival.
Geopolitical strategy shows us how geographic factors shape international relations and power among countries. Countries might expand not just to get more money but to make sure they are better protected. The need for defensive control pushes a lot of the world’s political tensions forward.
The mix of geography, resources, and national security is a big deal in global affairs. As the world gets more connected, using geography smartly and securing weak points is key to geopolitical strategy.
Source Links
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-geography-shapes-international-politics/2016/01/06/f3ea4eea-9223-11e5-b5e4-279b4501e8a6_story.html
- https://www.shortform.com/blog/examples-of-geopolitics/
- https://tnsr.org/2023/09/rethinking-geopolitics-geography-as-an-aid-to-statecraft/
- https://public.websites.umich.edu/~geostein/docs/Steinmetz 2012 Geopolitics for Ritzer.pdf
- https://www.bookey.app/topic/exploring-global-politics:-prisoners-of-geography-book-club-discussion-questions-&-insights
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25135194-prisoners-of-geography
- https://is.cuni.cz/studium/predmety/index.php?do=download&did=42331&kod=JTM294
- https://academic.oup.com/book/25755/chapter/193309236
- https://www.e-ir.info/2022/05/21/power-and-development-in-global-politics/
- https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/wp91-geopolitics.pdf
- https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2404308/3a-contemporary-great-power-geostrategic-dynamics-relations-and-strategies/
- https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/10/russia-geography-ukraine-syria/413248/
- https://www.irena.org/-/media/files/irena/agency/publication/2019/jan/global_commission_geopolitics_new_world_2019.pdf
- https://geographicbook.com/geopolitics-of-world-resources/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geopolitics_of_the_Arctic
- https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1695&context=fac_journ
- https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/security-insights/strategic-culture-and-geography-russias-southern-seas-after-crimea-0
- https://www.bisa.ac.uk/articles/how-do-colonial-legacies-shape-contemporary-global-political-economy
- https://academic.oup.com/book/44050/chapter/371938645
- https://slcc.pressbooks.pub/humangeography/part/political-geography/
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/geopolitics
- https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/membership/professional-development/refresher-readings/introduction-geopolitics
- https://academic.oup.com/book/7273/chapter/151981225
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244374/


